🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.